Sample G
The pros
- Well-integrated sources lead to a varied reading experience
- Claims are well-supported
- Implications of fast-paced lifestyles are satisfactorily explored
- Word choice is varied
- Sentence structure is choppy, hard to follow
- Lots of cop-out or general claims like “We are among the top producers as well as top consumers of a multitude of products” in the introduction paragraph
- Repetitive conclusions, lack of depth in analyzation
- A paragraph wholly dedicated to “Holy Shit”
- Overuse of third-person plural in reference to “American society”
- Some citations, like the one on page 5, contribute little to the discourse
Sample H
The pros
- Varied word choice
- Interesting background information on Apple products
- Use of “etc.”
- Little to no analyzation; paper is merely a summary of Apple product offerings
- The claim at the end of page 4 is both poorly constructed and not supported with proper evidence
- Page 4 is a sea of quotation marks that make me think the writer likes to use “air quotes” in real life
- On page 3, content about podcasting is plagiarized from the Wikipedia article on the topic
- Copious amounts of speculation and irrelevant personal addenda
No comments:
Post a Comment